Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization
From: Robert Scott (no-one_at_dont-mail-me.com)
Date: 02/19/05
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock frequency"
- Previous message: Joerg: "Re: JOB US-MN Senior Embedded Software Engineer – Long Term Contract with Biomedical Leader"
- In reply to: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Next in thread: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Reply: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:49:41 GMT
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:38:17 -0000, dplatt@radagast.org (Dave Platt)
wrote:
>The PPS pulses are infrequent enough, and subject to enough jitter,
>that the drivers will need to do a fairly significant amount of
>low-pass filtering before using the pulse information to calibrate the
>internal clock.
Not true. You can buy a GPS receiver that produces 1 PPS with hardly
any jitter at all. By using a PLL, a high-quality frequency standard
can and has been made. You don't need a lot of low-pass filtering in
that PLL.
-Robert Scott
Ypsilanti, Michigan
(Reply through this forum, not by direct e-mail to me, as automatic reply address is fake.)
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock frequency"
- Previous message: Joerg: "Re: JOB US-MN Senior Embedded Software Engineer – Long Term Contract with Biomedical Leader"
- In reply to: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Next in thread: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Reply: Dave Platt: "Re: Variations on XTAL clock AND time synchronization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|