ISP programming and code prrotection
From: eeh (eehobbyist_at_yahoo.com.hk)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: [ANN] Atmel invest millions of $ to please Jim Granville"
- Next in thread: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: SFC: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: cbarn24050_at_aol.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: Mike Harrison: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: David Powell: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Mar 2005 23:53:15 -0800
Hi,
I know that many products support ROM upgrade or in system programming
(ISP). However, from my brain that logically to enable this feature the
mcu should not be locked.
So I have a question that whether the above thinking is right ro not.
Or if it is right, is it possible to make ISP possible and
simultaneously protect our firmware code from being read during
verification?
Thanks!
- Next message: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: [ANN] Atmel invest millions of $ to please Jim Granville"
- Next in thread: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: larwe_at_larwe.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: SFC: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: cbarn24050_at_aol.com: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: Mike Harrison: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Reply: David Powell: "Re: ISP programming and code prrotection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|