Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?
From: Gavin Scott (gavin_at_allegro.com)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: HF pulse generator"
- Previous message: Lasse Langwadt Christensen: "Re: MISRA Rule 45"
- In reply to: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Next in thread: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Reply: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:32:45 -0000
In comp.arch Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.theworld.com> wrote:
> Ada has some requirements on the built-in (pseudo) random number
> generators. See:
> http://www.adaic.org/standards/95aarm/html/AA-G-2-5.html
> I don't really understand this stuff. Does it result in "terrible",
> as you say, output?
Nice short summary of Knuth's tests for randomness in there.
But it only requires a period of 2^31-1, which certainly isn't useful
for security applications (given a very small number of sequential
outputs from such a generator you can predict the next value to be
generated with fairly high probability etc.).
Looks like a nice formal requirement that the PRNG at least not be
abysmally bad :-)
But those requirements still don't get you a PRNG that you'd want to
use for any serious application I think.
Offhand I don't recall whether the simple linear congruential generators
can be constructed to pass Knuth's tests or not (Knuth probably says).
G.
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: HF pulse generator"
- Previous message: Lasse Langwadt Christensen: "Re: MISRA Rule 45"
- In reply to: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Next in thread: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Reply: Robert A Duff: "Re: Random Number Generation -----> Hardware or Software?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|