Re: EU lead-free directive
- From: paul$@pcserv.demon.co.uk (Paul Carpenter)
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:44:09 +0100 (BST)
On Wednesday, in article
<rmuq91dit16ommcjfg5rsdk0hncov0sj7a@xxxxxxx>
mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Mike Harrison" wrote:
>On Tue, 31 May 2005 17:54:24 +0200, Tilmann Reh <tilmannreh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Peter schrieb:
>>
>>> A really stupid regulation, given the huge amount of lead used in car
>>> batteries for example....
>>
>>Exactly. And particularly these are one of the exceptions, and will be used
>>without any change.
>
>This is an entirely sensible approach, as lead-acid batteries can be very
> easily extracted from
>discarded products and recycled unlike lead in components.
They have been for years! Not really a change.
--
Paul Carpenter | paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/> PC Services
<http://www.gnuh8.org.uk/> GNU H8 & mailing list info
<http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate
.
- References:
- Re: EU lead-free directive
- From: Mike Harrison
- Re: EU lead-free directive
- Prev by Date: Re: Regarding interrupt sharing architectures!
- Next by Date: Problems with powerpc-elf-gdb and OCDRemote
- Previous by thread: Re: EU lead-free directive
- Next by thread: Re: EU lead-free directive
- Index(es):
