Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- From: "bitmaster" <geek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:52 GMT
"Mehta Shailendrakumar" <shailendrakumar.mehta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:da06l4$r72$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi All,
>
> I will be using 8051 based micro-controller for my project.
> I want to choose C complier for it between Keil and IAR.
> Anybody who has experience on these compilers please help me in doing this
> and
> share your experiences with these compilers. Let me also know any
> benchmarks, comparisons
> about the performances of these compilers.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Shailendra
Both are well thought of. IAR are notorious for restrictions
such as; dongle required and a special code that takes a week to get,
you don't buy the IAR compiler, you buy the right to use it ... meaning
you can not resell it.
Keil is much less restricted and has put out a quality product for many
years.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- From: Bob Stephens
- Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- References:
- IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- From: Mehta Shailendrakumar
- IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- Prev by Date: Re: Arm gnu directive assembler problem
- Next by Date: Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- Previous by thread: Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- Next by thread: Re: IAR v/s KEIL for 8051
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
