Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:23:06 +0100
Mike Harrison wrote:
> Learn one thoroughly - doesn't really matter which - once you get used
> to micro programming techniques in general, learning a new chip doesn't
> take much effort.PIC has the advantage of a quickly-memorized
> instruction set and vast amount of free resources. Probably best to
> start on 8 bit as skills scale better upwards than down. Learning
> assembler will make you able to write much better C code when you move
> onto bigger systems as you will have a much better understanding of the
> underlying hardware.
I was hoping folks would say PIC, because there's a Maplin shop nearby
that sells PIC programmer/tester kits (Velleman K8048), and I can drive
that from PiKdev on Linux. I figure on turning up to a job interview
with some 8-bit doohickey I designed, breadboarded and coded, plus spec
docs and code printouts. Should make up for lack of formal
qualifications :-)
I assume it's C all the way, though Ada95 and Forth wouldn't hurt?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Paul Carpenter
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- References:
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Mike Harrison
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Prev by Date: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Next by Date: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Previous by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Next by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Index(es):