Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Vadim Borshchev <vadim.borshchev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:30:34 +0100
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:35:40 +0200, Sebastien <sebastien.bourdeauducq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The jump address is incorrect : it should be _binary_monitor_arm_start+0x08
instead (and the code actually fails because of that when loaded in the
CPU).
Do I understand you right that you are loading and executing the code from the object file (main.o) *before* you have it linked into executable?
Vadim .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Vadim Borshchev
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- References:
- Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Sebastien
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Tauno Voipio
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Sebastien
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Vadim Borshchev
- Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- From: Sebastien
- Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- Prev by Date: Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- Next by Date: Re: Confused with "task" keyword.
- Previous by thread: Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- Next by thread: Re: Jump addresses messed up with GNU as
- Index(es):