Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: "Paul E. Bennett" <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:19:16 +0100
Joerg wrote:
>> I assume it's C all the way, though Ada95 and Forth wouldn't hurt?
>
> In today's environment it's C and assembler. Usually inline assembler
> which you can embed in your C code. I have never heard anyone in the
> industry (medical in my case0 use ADA or Forth.
I know of at least three projects in medical systems using Forth (two of
them are life-critical). Forth is also used in a wide variety of space
applications and industrial control.
--
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett ....................<email://peb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy .....<http://www.amleth.demon.co.uk/>
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-811095
Going Forth Safely ....EBA. http://www.electric-boat-association.org.uk/
********************************************************************
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- References:
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Mike Harrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Joerg
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Prev by Date: Re: ld terminated with signal 11
- Next by Date: Re: C question
- Previous by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Next by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Index(es):