Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:06:48 +0100
Joerg wrote:
Back in my university days in the 80's we had a few hardcore Forth fans. They wouldn't touch anything else.
I used to be one of them. At the time, I saw Forth as a sort of MSI solution, between the 'TTL gates' approach of assembler and the MSI of C, Pascal etc. It was also easy to get Forth cheaply for small processors, whereas C tended to be very expensive and clunky.
Nowadays, reasonably good C is available for nearly all processors, and Forth is a bit of a backwater. I'd certainly rather try to read even badly written C than Forth, and not having to keep track of the stack clinches it for me.
Paul Burke .
- References:
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Mike Harrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Julian Morrison
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Paul E. Bennett
- Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- From: Joerg
- Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Perfect Counter/Timer Circuit?
- Next by Date: Re: AT91RM9200-EK & BasicGraphicDisplay
- Previous by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Next by thread: Re: Learning embedded coding, which uC?
- Index(es):