Re: Tiny ARM Development

From: "ken" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:30:38 GMT

> Depends on the ARM. AT91SAM7S64 (as quoted by OP) is approx. 30 MIPS
> vs. 20 MIPS for Atmega32. This is not a whole lot of performance gain.
> AT91RM9200 is 200 MIPS and might make a different. However, the cost
> is also higher.

MIPS - A meaningless comparison - one is an 8bit the other a 32bit, both
with different instruction sets.

.

References:
- Tiny ARM Development
  - From: Alex McHale
- Re: Tiny ARM Development
  - From: larwe
- Re: Tiny ARM Development
  - From: alexmchale@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tiny ARM Development
  - From: larwe
- Re: Tiny ARM Development
  - From: linnix

Prev by Date: Re: Tiny ARM Development
Next by Date: Re: C question 2
Previous by thread: Re: Tiny ARM Development
Next by thread: Re: Tiny ARM Development
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Which DSP DSK for 700 MFLOPS Audio
... MIPS on DSP. ... Dmitry ... Prev by Date: ...
(comp.dsp)
SPIM is to MIPS assembler as .... is to SPARC..?
... Something like the xspim and spim did for MIPS... ... Regan ... Prev by Date: ...
(alt.lang.asm)
Re: Building a DAB radio
... My BT Aviator DAB radio uses an ADI Blackfin DSP, delivering something ... like 500 MIPS. ... Leon ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.radio.amateur.homebrew)
AMR- WB & AMR- NB
... ARM9E. ... please clarify. ... How many MIPS the AMR- WB will take generally? ... Prev by Date: ...
(comp.dsp)