Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:09:33 +0100
Murray R. Van Luyn wrote:
You now have in your possession a piece of code that is highly marketable, and you appear to have chosen to preserve a market for it by eliminating its competition. Better than that, you seem to believe that you have manipulated someone into performing the value adding process for you.
That's total bollocks. He wrote the code; it's his. He generously allowed you to use it; you abused his generosity by making it not work with his compiler. You COULD have kept compatibility- he's indicated that he would have been totally happy with that.
Put yourself in the other guy's shoes. In the long term it's in YOUR interest that people should coontinue to provide everybody with good stuff, free of charge. What do they get from it? In dave's case, the chance of a sale. What's wrong with that. Other people do it to have something spicy on the CV, or because they need a modification and they automatically publish it under the terms of the licence.
Paul Burke .
- References:
- Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Murray R. Van Luyn
- Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Murray R. Van Luyn
- Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Dave Dunfield
- Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Dave Dunfield
- Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- From: Murray R. Van Luyn
- Free FAT16 Filesystem
- Prev by Date: GUI Development Tools
- Next by Date: CAN Bus Higher Layer Protocols
- Previous by thread: Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- Next by thread: Re: Free FAT16 Filesystem
- Index(es):