Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: "db" <dbahlmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2005 07:32:34 -0700
It's not 1 or 3. Number 2 could be possible but the float routines is
not very big and I have about 6KB stack allocated. I have decreased
stack size to 4KB to see if the problem gets worse but it stays the
same. Any other possibilities? Thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Paul Carpenter
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Lanarcam
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Rich Webb
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- References:
- Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: db
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Richard
- Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Prev by Date: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Next by Date: Changing subjects (was Re: Normal 4-pin USB to USB-OTG?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Next by thread: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Index(es):
