Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: "Lanarcam" <lanarcam1@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2005 10:31:42 -0700
db wrote:
> It's not 1 or 3. Number 2 could be possible but the float routines is
> not very big and I have about 6KB stack allocated. I have decreased
> stack size to 4KB to see if the problem gets worse but it stays the
> same. Any other possibilities? Thanks
It could be a register modified by the ISR and not
saved at the beginning and restored at the end.
.
- References:
- Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: db
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: Richard
- Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- From: db
- Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Prev by Date: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Next by Date: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Previous by thread: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Next by thread: Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC
- Index(es):