Re: Floating point calculations on 16 uC

On 28 Aug 2005 07:32:34 -0700, "db" <dbahlmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>It's not 1 or 3. Number 2 could be possible but the float routines is
>not very big and I have about 6KB stack allocated. I have decreased
>stack size to 4KB to see if the problem gets worse but it stays the
>same. Any other possibilities? Thanks

[Please quote relevant portions of context when replying. Thanks.]

One possibility is that (stack allocated) is not necessarily equal to
(stack actually used).

--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Aberdeen
    ... Please quote some context when replying to a post. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Tragedy
    ... > Please don't remove what you are replying to since it makes your answer ... Please get a decent newsreader that will show context;-) ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Thatll be a write off then.
    ... replying in too, so people can see some context. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Game engines
    ... Without quoting we can't see who you are ... replying to easily. ... context. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg)
  • Re: Thatll be a write off then.
    ... >replying in too, so people can see some context. ... >Now *they* need a good shoeing. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)