Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- From: Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:45:25 -0000
On 2005-09-01, Stephen Pelc <stephenXXX@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Atmel AT91 ARM7 cores mostly use a 16 bit external bus and no
> caches. The ARM9 cores are nearly always cached and the memory system
> is usually optimised for SDRAM.
>
> Of the ARM7 chips we have used, the Philips LPC2000 family's MAM
> unit is far and away the best solution for hard real-time systems. The
> downside is that it only works on internal Flash (up to 512k). The
> cached Sharp parts are pretty good too, providing you can live with
> the usual cache side-effects.
Samsung's ARM7 parts have a cache, and are pretty cheap (though
in my experience the peripherals tend to be buggy). The
Linksys WAPs run Samsung ARM7 parts and can be a cheap
"development platform" for running uCLinux.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I Know A Joke!!
at
visi.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- From: Stephen Pelc
- Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- References:
- general questions regarding ARMs
- From: Michael J. Noone
- Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- From: Stephen Pelc
- general questions regarding ARMs
- Prev by Date: Re: Altium Protel?
- Next by Date: Re: Newbie with questions on AT91RM9200
- Previous by thread: Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- Next by thread: Re: general questions regarding ARMs
- Index(es):