Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 From: "TheDoc" <thedoc@xxxxxxx>
 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:35:29 GMT
"AutumnFox" <jie.yao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129908592.135504.122270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I have a problem with the crc calculation for the preferred roaming
> list.
> Here is a roaming list from a motorola phone
>
> Roaming List NAM 0:
> 00 31 30 39 00 02 40 03 10 51 c8 49 8c 6b b9 6a
> b0 74 d8 e1 b8 6e 14 a3 70 89 94 a3 02 5d 63 47
> 84 57 41 15 e0 0c 08 22 bc 81 02 2b 9c 0a 06 98
> dd
>
> The last two bytes are the 16 bit CRCccitt result for the message
> ahead.
> According to the protocol TIAEIAIS683A , the crc calcuation is
> described as follows:
>
> Page 343 of IS683A
> (http://www.3gpp2.org/Public_html/specs/C.S00160with3Gcover.pdf )
> the 16 bit preferred roaming list crc field PR_LIST_CRC is calculated
> on all bits of the PRL excluding the bits of the PR_LIST_CRC field
> itself. The generator polynomial for this CRC is g(x) = x^16+x^12+x^5 +
> 1
> ................
> using the logic shown in figure 2.2.12
> ..............
> initially, all shift register elements are set to logical one and the
> switches are set in the position A.
> the register is clocked with each preferred roaming list bit as an
> input,from the most significant bit of the PR_LIST_SIZE field through
> the least significant bit of the reserved field.
> the switches are set in the position B and the register is clocked an
> additional 16 times. the 16 additional output bits constitute the CRC.
>
> >From the above, I think the algorithm should be CRCCCITT with initial
> value 0xffff, am I correct ?
>
> After I programmed like the protocol , I found the crc result is 0x6722
> instead of 0x89dd. Also I tested on the website
>
http://www.lammertbies.nl/comm/info/crccalculation.html?crc=00+31+30+39+00+02+40+03+10+51+c8+49+8c+6b+b9+6a+++b0+74+d8+e1+b8+6e+14+a3+70+89+94+a3+02+5d+63+47+84+57+41+15+e0+0c+08+22+bc+81+02+2b+9c+0a+06&method=hex
>
> which gave me the same result ( which means I am correct ? )
>
> Now I am wondering whether it is possible they use a different
> algorithm to calculate the CRC of the preferred roaming list ?
> And I am wondering whether it matters if I use the protocol algorithm
> not their algorithm.
>
per previous post.. it looks like you did have a typo.. the last two data
bytes
are indeed 0x98dd...
enjoy..
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 From: AutumnFox
 Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 References:
 CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 From: AutumnFox
 CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 Prev by Date: Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 Next by Date: Re: Microchip Introduces First 16bit Microcontroller Product Line  the PIC24
 Previous by thread: Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 Next by thread: Re: CRC of Preferred Roaming List problem
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
