Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: cs_posting@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Oct 2005 10:10:46 -0700
Sonic wrote:
> I'm not sure if I am missing something, but this seems like a stupid
> conversation :)
>
> TCP is a connection based protocol and as such it ensures that all data is
> received in the correct order and without errors.
Yes, but in this corner of the thread they are talking about a proposal
to not use TCP, but rather use something like UDP to carry some legacy
serial protocol that does it's own reliability checking - which leads
to comments about how that task is different for different sorts of
connection.
Using TCP is a good alternative... it's just not the only one.
.
- References:
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: Frieder Ferlemann
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: packer44
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: Ignacio G.T.
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- From: Sonic
- Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- Prev by Date: Re: Parallel Port Wigglers PCI Cards and XP
- Next by Date: Re: Parallel Port Wigglers PCI Cards and XP
- Previous by thread: Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- Next by thread: Re: Serial (rs232 etc.) to IP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|