Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- From: "Riscy" <riscy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2005 22:25:26 -0800
As far I concern there is variation of 74HC that could replace 4099
(try 74HC59X or 74HC57X in that range). I would try make use of 74HC
since 4099 belong to ice age now. They bound to phase out very soon,
just like window 3.1 and 95.
It can work on 3.3 V or 5V, better output drive, faster and more stable
device than 4099.
Riscy.
.
- References:
- Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- From: Tauno Voipio
- Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- From: MM
- Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- From: antedeluvian
- Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- From: MM
- Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- Prev by Date: Re: KEil bought by ARM
- Next by Date: Re: mobile processors
- Previous by thread: Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- Next by thread: Re: Choice between CMOS 4099 or 74HC259
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|