Re: CCITT in C++ for AVR

RadGar wrote:

> Ian Bell napisa?(a):
>> I do not understand. You said you 'chose' to go with CCITT.
>>
>> Ian
>
> Well in fact I was the one to choose the CCITT, but the project manager
> (let's call him that :D) told me to stick with already existing CRCs and
> gave a CCITT as an example (which was in fact most common to my
> understanding). So own created 16bit CRC was never an option.

Now I understand. However, the CRC I described is very common - it would not
be your own creation. Furthermore an even simpler version which just uses a
single byte CRC is almost certainly available for the AVR as it is the one
often used when programming these devices.

ian
.