Re: Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- From: Kelly Hall <khall@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:44:33 GMT
Telenochek wrote:
Sure I understand that right now FPGA dev tools put a heavy burden on the developer. Same goes for ARM development.
I've heard similar arguments for software development: "The powerful UML-based tools will make conventional programming languages like C/C++ obsolete for most programming."
In fact, I know of one company that replaced a legacy 8051 design (written in C and assembly) with a new one based on a ColdFire and developed entirely in state-machine UML that is compiled down to executable code with a custom run-time environment.
They seem happy with their new implementation, although they managed to replace a $30 BoM with a $100 BoM, upped their power usage, and upped their physical volume. And (IMHO) made their code largely unmaintainable to "conventional" embedded systems developers. Ever seen a UML state machine for bit-banging I2C? Blech.
A few years back I was convinced that we'd be seeing large-scale use of Java for embedded devices, mostly based on the availability of cheap Java programmers and MCU that speak Java natively. Hasn't happened yet. Now I doubt that it ever will, although Ajile is still making their CPUs and seems sustainable, if not profitable.
Horses for courses.
Kelly .
- References:
- Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- From: Telenochek
- Re: Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- From: Jim Stewart
- Re: Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- From: Telenochek
- Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- Prev by Date: constructing modbus tcp messages for float and 32 bit integers
- Next by Date: Re: Gigabit ethernet ICs
- Previous by thread: Re: Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- Next by thread: Re: Will SoC completely replace generalized microcontrollers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|