Re: MCU + USB

From: "Nappy" <noemail@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:37:23 GMT

"Mochuelo" <cucafera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6m3mp1lvudamc67sjetl287qfpr7quhk3a@xxxxxxxxxx

> Also, is it true that if I go for option 1 I need to buy a (USB)
> vendor ID, and that this is expensive?

NOt necessarily. I am not sure what you are doing but a Vendor ID is $1500.
Although you can run with the Cypress VID using their driver.. or you can
fake your own for in-house use.

>
>

.

References:
- MCU + USB
  - From: Mochuelo
- Re: MCU + USB
  - From: Nappy
- Re: MCU + USB
  - From: Mochuelo

Prev by Date: Re: MCU + USB
Next by Date: Emulation instead
Previous by thread: Re: MCU + USB
Next by thread: Re: MCU + USB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

re(4) slowly dies
... usb0: USB revision 1.0 ... vendor = 'Intel Corporation' ... subclass = HOST-PCI ...
(freebsd-current)
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set up
... usb0: USB revision 1.0 ... vendor = 'Intel Corporation' ... subclass = HOST-PCI ...
(freebsd-current)
Re: new hardware - compatible?
... usb0: USB revision 1.0 ... AHCI called from vendor specific driver ... subclass = HOST-PCI ...
(freebsd-questions)
Re: DigiBoard Xem with 2 extenal modules
... vendor = 'Intel Corporation' ... subclass = HOST-PCI ... device = '82801IB/IR/IH USB Universal Host Controller' ...
(freebsd-stable)
Re: Bug?: (bge) BCM5787 makes 7.0/8-CURRENT completely unusable (Was: Issue: bge still freezes R
... usb0: USB revision 1.0 ... vendor = 'Intel Corporation' ... subclass = HOST-PCI ...
(freebsd-net)