Re: The perfect part except ...
- From: "larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jan 2006 13:36:00 -0800
mhahn@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Lewin's right about the speed tradeoff, but doing a uart in software is
> a lot harder than doing a SPI interface in software.
"Harder" in the sense of "more difficult" or in the sense of "occupying
more resources on the uC"?
Yes, it's "harder" to write an asynchronous soft-UART than it is to
implement synchronous serial protocols. However, if one can't get it
working inside one, perhaps two days at most, then someone else should
be writing the code :)
Considering the data volumes, the uC is going to spend a lot more time
executing SPI code vs. soft-async-UART code.
.
- References:
- The perfect part except ...
- From: Silver Beetle
- Re: The perfect part except ...
- From: larwe
- Re: The perfect part except ...
- From: mhahn
- The perfect part except ...
- Prev by Date: Re: RS232 Voltage Levels
- Next by Date: Re: Software DTMF /tone detection
- Previous by thread: Re: The perfect part except ...
- Next by thread: Re: The perfect part except ...
- Index(es):