Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: "ElderUberGeek" <aribloch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 05:17:55 -0800
I don't see why you say my question makes no sense. I am quoting your
last post:
"Maybe you want to reconsider using TDP. UDP may be adequate, and
certainly simpler to implement."
So, you yourself say that UDP may be adequate (i.e. I understand this
as "better") - so I am asking why.
Thanks
By the way, I am fully aware of Usenet and news readers.....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- References:
- Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- From: CBFalconer
- Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- Prev by Date: AC Line Monitor and/or Opto Coupler (need for 3.3v board)
- Next by Date: Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- Previous by thread: Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- Next by thread: Re: Client/Server (Master/Slave) or mixed mode?
- Index(es):