Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:24:27 -0000
On 2006-02-08, Isaac Bosompem <x86asm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
diggerdo wrote:
Single clock C51 FLASH variants hit 33MHz, 35MHz, 50MHz, 66MHz, 100MHz
from various vendors - rather faster than the AVR.
So, why bother ?
Rehashed 8051 is a bit like your grandmother trying on a bikini.
Not a pretty site.
AVR was designed from the ground up to be a modern processor.
Why would a rehashed 8051 be THAT bad?
The 8051 is a great architecture, I moved from the PIC to the 8051/2
and have never looked back.
Ah, the PIC. The only uController architecture other than the
8048 that would make the 8051 look like a breath of fresh air. ;)
The single cycle cores add life to the 8051 line and it still
is a viable competitor to other 8-bit MCU's decades after its
first incarnation.
Actually, if you can get by with internal SRAM and not have to
use XDATA and use a programming language that doesn't expect a
user-accessible stack, it's not really that bad an architecture.
It just sucks as a C target for applications with lots of data.
It has tons of free compilers and assemblers out there and
lots of example code. It is more mature and is easy to find
decent information on it.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! WHO sees a BEACH
at BUNNY sobbing on a SHAG
visi.com RUG?!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: Ian Bell
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- References:
- Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: ziggy
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: diggerdo
- Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- From: Isaac Bosompem
- Moving from 8051 to AVR
- Prev by Date: Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- Next by Date: Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- Previous by thread: Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- Next by thread: Re: Moving from 8051 to AVR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|