Re: @far directive not working as expected
- From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 14:50:49 GMT
cyberzl1@xxxxxxxxx <cyberzl1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
^-- insert "incapable" hereAnd why is that bad? Is that architecture of addressing functions as
"far" if they are in "near space"? Are you running out of "near"
space?
That is bad because I wanted it in far space.
That's not bad in and of itself. It's only bad if this actually
prevents the program from working. Does it?
I tried to put in far space for a reason. Near space is my limiting
factor right now.
So: is the link failing, or the program failing to run, because of
this? Have you, or have you not, actually run out of near space?
Assuming "near space" is a subset of "far space" on your architecture,
a linker that fills up unused parts of near space with functions from
"far" space doesn't do anything wrong.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: @far directive not working as expected
- From: cyberzl1@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: @far directive not working as expected
- References:
- @far directive not working as expected
- From: cyberzl1@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: @far directive not working as expected
- From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker
- Re: @far directive not working as expected
- From: cyberzl1@xxxxxxxxx
- @far directive not working as expected
- Prev by Date: Re: BT USB HID control. ( packet )
- Next by Date: Re: What's the modern way to dim AC lights?
- Previous by thread: Re: @far directive not working as expected
- Next by thread: Re: @far directive not working as expected
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|