Re: FM0 (bi-phase space) decoding!

In article <1145446014.845199.9320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ali
<abdulrazaq@xxxxxxxxx> writes
Well that's totally personal choice and yeah its true when it comes
to broken links , the reason I use web interface is freedom from
applications (newsreaders , feedbacks etc. ).

Top posting too.... Are yo deliberately trying to piss people off?

Do you realise how stupid your last comment was... "freedom from
applications" like news readers.... you are using a web browser That is
an application and it is less secure than a news reader.

You clearly have little knowledge of what you are doing.


David wrote:
If you want to capture both edges, it might be easier to route the
signal to two interrupt pins and configure one for rising edges, and
the
other for falling edges. Timer captures can also be useful here.

Thanks David sounds interesting, I have tried to capture both edges on
the same interrupt pin and now i'll try to capture both edges with tow
pins. What kind of software filter I can design to eliminate the noise
factor?


Frank Bemelman wrote:
I think you should be concentrating on getting a proper newsreader and quit
using that broken Google interface to usenet.
Because it is possible to post correctly from Google, new Google posters may
get the benefit of the doubt, but their credit quickly evaporates, and
certainly when you start
lecturing about the whereabouts of the original post.
And to confirm that, *PLONK* !


Hmm interesting , ain't gonna confirm anything let the readers decide
;-)

You he is right. You can set up the goolge reader to conform to the
rules if not you ain't going to get much help
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



.