Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 12:38:05 -0400
John Devereux wrote:
"Tom Lucas" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:.... snip ...
Fortunately, a lot of the time and dates concerned with the
system will be as timestamps on data for PC download so the PC
can handle all the conversions.
I would format all dates like 2006-05-03 17:12:22.
If anyone whinges, tell them it is the International Standard:
I have been doing so for about 20 years or more. Even in the US, I
have no complaints, and the result is universally understood.
Well, my wife used to tell me I was a trouble-maker.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
.
- References:
- Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: Tom Lucas
- Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: Paul Keinanen
- Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: Stephen Pelc
- Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: Tom Lucas
- Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- From: John Devereux
- Language Selcection Philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- Next by Date: Re: Microcontroller selection
- Previous by thread: Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: Language Selcection Philosophy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|