Re: Microcontroller selection

TheDoc wrote:
<fenriswolfnews@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146670672.085760.252690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for all the good suggestions. I'll look into them today. One
person asked why I wanted 32 or 16 bit processors. I'd even use an 8
bit one, however, I simply didn't find one with the numerous I/O and
features that I need. The reduced code size is always a plus for 8
bits, but a lot of architectures negate this extra with having tons
of flash, so it didn't really bother. I am currently using an 8 bit
atmel, but the new design requires a lot more I/O and speed than
that little guy can muster. Thanks to everyone, you guys are
excellent.


How about cygnal ( now silabs ) ?
fast devices with up to 64 pins i/o uart,spi etc..

Since you can get 100 pin AVRs that is probably not what he is looking for.

--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
This message is intended to be my own personal view and it
may or may not be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB


.