Re: uC for Indirect Execution
- From: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:26:00 +0200
"rektide" <rektide@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1147392869.617901.143150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey everyone,
I'm looking at starting a new uClinux platform for myself sometime in
the not-too-far-future. I've got a couple favorites I'd like to play
with, namely the Blackfin BF561 and the Lpc3180. However, I'm kind of
worried about what code I can execute: if i recall correctly, neither
of these architectures (ARM9 and blackfin) can execute code indirectly,
can run code from ram. I presume this is a restriction of their
Harvard architetures.
Where can you store code for these architectures?
What are fast & low powered micros that can execute code from memory?
I could be dead wrong, if so, please except my graceful apology.
-Rektide.
Why uCLinux for an ARM9 with an MMU.
Curious to know why you want to run Linux without any Ethernet nor LCD?
--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
This is intended to be my personal opinion which may,
or may bot be shared by my employer Atmel Nordic AB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: uC for Indirect Execution
- From: David Brown
- Re: uC for Indirect Execution
- References:
- uC for Indirect Execution
- From: rektide
- uC for Indirect Execution
- Prev by Date: Re: MP3 decoder
- Next by Date: Re: uclinux on any DIP/pin processor ?
- Previous by thread: Re: uC for Indirect Execution
- Next by thread: Re: uC for Indirect Execution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
