Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 May 2006 21:56:23 +0200
Peter Dickerson wrote:
"Rasmus Fink" <rfi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:446aec08$0$47058$edfadb0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the input, guys.generation
It's nice to hear that the 4.x.x is considered stable not only by its
authors. Have any of you compared the code size generated by V3.x.x vs
4.x.x ?
The device is a AT91SAM7S256, so code space is right now not really an
issue, _YET_ - but the expected product life time is ~7 years, so much
can still happen...
/Rasmus
Richard wrote:I don't think I have ever found a bug with gcc-arm.Some of the earlier 3.x.x versions had big problems in ISR codenow.and ARM/THUMB interworking. I think this has been fixed for some time
I found 4.1.0 to be a tiny bit bigger than 3.4.3 but also to feel a bit
faster. I'm guessing a few things product inline code rather than call
support routines resulting in a little bloat in return for speed.
Peter
For smaller programs, gcc 4.1 has the potential to produce smaller and faster code by compiling the entire program at once, letting it do inter-procedural optimisations even across modules.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- References:
- Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: Rasmus Fink
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: Richard
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: Rasmus Fink
- Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- From: Peter Dickerson
- Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Coldfire development on Linux host
- Next by Date: Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- Next by thread: Re: Which GCC Version to use with ARM7 ?
- Index(es):