Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: Dave Rahardja <ask@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:51:49 GMT
On 24 May 2006 15:40:57 +0200, David Brown
<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So perhaps what you're looking for is an IDE that works well with gcc.
The biggie that springs to mind is Eclipse, but there are others that
might be worth looking at (I haven't tried these much - if you think
you've found something ideal, let us know):
https://libre2.adacore.com/gps/
www.jedit.org
http://bvrde.sourceforge.net/index.htm
There are other linux IDEs, such as KDevelop, which which work with
cross-compilers. There are also a number of good editors and gdb
front-ends (such as DDD and Insight) if you don't need the integration.
And of course, there is always emacs :-)
Hey now, that's interesting!
-dr
.
- References:
- Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: Dave Rahardja
- Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: Dave Rahardja
- Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: Dave Rahardja
- Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- From: David Brown
- Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- Prev by Date: Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- Next by Date: Re: Orcad symbols for the AT91SAM family?
- Previous by thread: Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- Next by thread: Re: Green Hills vs. Freescale CodeWarrior for ColdFire development
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|