Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- From: Chris Hills <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:50:04 +0100
In article <1149049649.966119.195930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
scott.manton@xxxxxxxxx writes
As I understand it the eval version is only good for 4K of code. In my
project I am the only developer, so I want to know if there is a good
reason to spend the money on the full version of Keil.
It works.
It is the best 8051 compiler available.
It has a very good simulator/debugger
It has lots of support
There is a lot more to 8051 variants than just changing the header
files.
Chris Hills wrote:
Why would you want to use SDCC whey you already have a perfectly good
compiler. You don't get better than the Keil for 8051.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- From: scott . manton
- Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- References:
- SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- From: scott . manton
- Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- From: Chris Hills
- Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- From: scott . manton
- SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- Prev by Date: Re: what's wrong with a pic ?
- Next by Date: Re: beginner and 8051
- Previous by thread: Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- Next by thread: Re: SDCC with Cypress FX2LP - Issues? Limitations?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|