Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Ian Bell <ruffrecords@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 10:52:12 +0100
Jim Granville wrote:
Alistair George wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Alistair George wrote:
Re HEF40106BT been there, tried that does not work in our use, which as
a very high gain oscillator.
You are using a hex schmitt trigger as a high gain oscillator?
Ian
Yes, in the original National app notes shows a schmitt trigger as an
oscillator. Variations between manufacturers have largely made that form
of use redundant.
This is curious - I take it you mean something other than the
standard, widely used 2 terminal RC Schmitt oscillator ( or the 3
terminal oscillator, which is more acurate but needs 3 gates of a 40106 )
?
I think he means in a crystal oscillator - ISTR this was a common way of
generating a microprocessor clock in the 80s but even then it was known to
be unreliable due to using a digital device in an analog mode.
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- References:
- 8051 dead or what?
- From: Alistair George
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Alistair George
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Ian Bell
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Alistair George
- Re: 8051 dead or what?
- From: Jim Granville
- 8051 dead or what?
- Prev by Date: Re: 8051 dead or what?
- Next by Date: Re: Books / Articles on Embedded SW Architecture
- Previous by thread: Re: 8051 dead or what?
- Next by thread: Re: 8051 dead or what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|