Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- From: Robert Latest <boblatest@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 12:01:09 GMT
On 29 Jun 2006 04:24:22 -0700,
cbarn24050@xxxxxxx <cbarn24050@xxxxxxx> wrote
in Msg. <1151580262.882668.304060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Why would you need an 800kb/sec link when you only collect data at
200kb/sec? Are you producing extra data internaly?
The way I'm planning this at the moment is to separate the data
acquisition from the transfer (I tried to convey this idea by using the
wording "alternatingly"). I.e. the main loop of the program would work
like this:
1. Acquire a fixed amount of data into RAM
2. Transfer data to host system
3. Receive commands from host
4. Go to 1.
There's nothing wrong with doing the data transfer synchronously with
the acquisition. It's just not necessary.
robert
.
- References:
- Wich 16-bit MCU?
- From: Robert Latest
- Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- From: cbarn24050
- Wich 16-bit MCU?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- Next by Date: Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- Previous by thread: Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- Next by thread: Re: Wich 16-bit MCU?
- Index(es):