Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: "larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Aug 2006 20:15:01 -0700
David Kelly wrote:
compiler. I looked a lot at the output of avr-gcc. It never wrote
assembly that I could improve enough to justify the effort to rewrite in
assembly. Once or twice I changed a C expression for better assembly
Mmm, maybe. I'm currently evaluating avrgcc (with which I have a lot of
experience) against IAR and Rowley (with which I have relatively little
experience on AVR targets). There _are_ differences.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: FreeRTOS.org
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- References:
- PIC versus AVR
- From: mc
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: David Kelly
- PIC versus AVR
- Prev by Date: Re: ATmega 128 + driver ENC28j60
- Next by Date: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Previous by thread: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Next by thread: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|