PIC versus AVR
- From: "mc" <look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:54:00 -0400
I don't want to start a religious war, but could a few knowledgeable people
give me their impressions of the relative advantages of PIC vs AVR? Assume
that I will be using both, to some extent, for some time, and want to know
what their relative advantages are. Throw in MSP430 too if you'd like.
I'm mostly using PICs right now but am stuck on the fact that MPLAB requires
you to have write permissions in C:\Program Files (which we can't allow in a
big student lab with roaming profiles), and also, if you follow the
simplest, default path toward creating an ASM project, you run into a
62-character length limit on the full path to the file. Does AVR Studio
cooperate fully with normal Windows security practices, or does it, too,
require you to loosen security on the computer in order to run it?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: ku7485
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Yvan BOURNE
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Jim Granville
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: David Kelly
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: steve
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: larwe
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- Prev by Date: Cellular module sought
- Next by Date: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Previous by thread: Cellular module sought
- Next by thread: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|