Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Grant Edwards <grante@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:14:34 -0000
On 2006-08-08, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just wish some of the parts with CAN interfaces were
cheaper. For some reason, the H8 parts with CAN and a decent
amount of flash (128K+) are awfully expensive (in the $20
range). What I really want is 128K of flash, 16-24K of RAM,
and CAN -- but it costs about half as much to glue something
together using a 3062, 32K SRAM, and an external CAN
controller. :(
Maybe you can get an ARM7 with this.
It would need be $8 or less to make it cheaper than the current
3-chip solution.
AT91SAM7A3 would fit but has 256 kB of flash.
I'll take a look. More flash is never a problem. :)
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! A can of ASPARAGUS,
at 73 pigeons, some LIVE ammo,
visi.com and a FROZEN DAQUIRI!!
.
- References:
- PIC versus AVR
- From: mc
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: David Kelly
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: larwe
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: FreeRTOS.org
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: steve
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Paul Carpenter
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Grant Edwards
- Re: PIC versus AVR
- From: Ulf Samuelsson
- PIC versus AVR
- Prev by Date: USB on a breadboard?
- Next by Date: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Previous by thread: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Next by thread: Re: PIC versus AVR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|