Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- From: James Beck <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:49:09 -0400
In article <1156915907.497673.230230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
abdulrazaq@xxxxxxxxx says...
He was joking.
So the RFID tag should have enough code and memory to keep track of other tags in >its immediate area ??
Yes you are right the right place to handle this problem is tag side.
Why should the tag need to handle that.
The tag is the dumb side the receiver is suppose to have enough
resources to track tags that won't/can't shut up.
.
- References:
- Improving RFID reader throughput!
- From: Ali
- Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- From: Ali
- Improving RFID reader throughput!
- Prev by Date: Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- Next by Date: Re: Tiny Bootloader
- Previous by thread: Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- Next by thread: Re: Improving RFID reader throughput!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|