Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: "rickman" <gnuarm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Sep 2006 03:32:00 -0700
CBFalconer wrote:
Robert Adsett wrote:
Paul Carpenter wrote:
albertgoodwill@xxxxxxxxx "Albert Goodwill" wrote:<snip>
* ADC (Analog to Digital Converter)
13 channel (simultaneous sample hold is desirable)
16 bits resolution
it will be used to capture 1000 samples/ second
I would have expected for these types of sensors a sampling rate<snip>
of 10 to 20Hz per channel giving 130 to 260 samples per second.
Considering the nature of the sensors being slow response and the
application simultaneous sample and hold seems unnecessary.
Following are the sensors to be connected to the embedded board
Sensors with analog outputs
* 3 axis accelerometers (0-5v or 0-3.3v analog outputs)
* 3 axis gyros (0-5v or 0-3.3v analog outputs)
* 3 axis magnetosensors (0-5v or 0-3.3v analog outputs)
* 2 pressure sensors (0-5v or 0-3.3v analog outputs)
* 2 current sensor (0-500mv outputs)
Except for the current sensors, the rest have response times,
that mean the output changes if you are lucky at 10Hz. See
comments above about A/D. I actually doubt that the current
sensors (probably for measuring power supply load to this
board and main radio control) actually need to be monitored
more than 1Hz anyway.
I would also question the need for 16bits of resolution. I
doubt any of these sensors have more than 10 or at most 12
bits worth of signal. Actually I wouldn't be surprised if 8
bits was overkill.
Albert, you need to ask what is the resolution you need for
acceptable results and also what resolution the sensors are
capaple of.
The OP might also reconsider the need for sample and hold. A
characteristic of successive approximation a-d converters built out
of d-a conversion is that they always measure a value that existed
somewhere withing the conversion period. A further advantage is
that the multiplexing can be done entirely digitally, so that the
cost of an added channel is that of a single comparator (and
possibly a front end op-amp). D-a converters are generally much
cheaper. The front end op-amp can easily implement anti-aliasing
filtering, besides the gain and impedance matching.
I think the reason he wants the sample and hold circuits is to measure
the values at the same time. I am sure he is going to merge the data
to calculate his position and orientation. I expect this is easier if
you have data that is updated at that same moment rather than data that
is spread out in time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: Paul Carpenter
- Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- References:
- Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: Albert Goodwill
- Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: Paul Carpenter
- Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: Robert Adsett
- Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- From: CBFalconer
- Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone used C/Peg (or Peg) UI
- Next by Date: Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- Previous by thread: Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- Next by thread: Re: Small low-cost embedded board for model airplane
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|