Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Frnak McKenney <frnak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:06:51 GMT
On 3 Oct 2006 07:18:15 -0700, John Mianowski <spamfree@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--snip--
Frnak McKenney wrote:
On 2 Oct 2006 06:59:48 -0700, John Mianowski <spamfree@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--snip--
CBFalconer wrote:
John Mianowski wrote:
CBFalconer wrote:
John Mianowski wrote:
... snip ...
What I need to do is rotate what amounts to a
lazy-susan/turntable/camera mount (pan only). I need to rotate up to
360 degrees, but not continuous. The device sits on a bearing so there
is no center shaft that I might couple to. OD is 3".
--snip--I also have to be able to survive immersion in fresh water for up to 30
minutes.
What sort of positional resolution (in degrees, or even in gear
teeth count) do you require?
2 degrees of resolution is enough.
You can purchase "absolute encoder" discs for optical encoders. These
have black/white or opaque/clear segments that provide a binary value
to a row of sensors so you can read the disc's current position
"directly" (possibly through, say, a Gray Code lookup table).
The same principle can be applied to a magnetic or mechanical encoder.
Put bumps on a disc, or lay down axial rows of tiny magnets to be read by
a row of Hall Effect sensors.
Is there any way you can apply this approach? You'er still faced with
the problem of choosing sensors (optical, Hall Effect, microswitches) that
can operate reliably underwater in fresh water.
I know about absolute encoders, but I still have the problem of needing
to track multiple turns, since I don't have a shaft to directly couple
to or the space to add a full-sized 1:1 gear.
And you can't add optical or magnetic sensors under the platform or
around its perimeter?
Magnetic strips might be a possibility, to tell me which segment of the
circle I happen to be in, with the resolver providing
more-than-sufficient resolution within that range. If I could
determine magnetic polarity, I should be able to reduce the number of
sensors to 2, with 4 strips staggered around the perimeter of my
turntable:
Ah. I misread the "2 degrees" (e.g. 1/180 revolution) resolution
requirement, so I was picturing someone embedding _lots_ of littly teeny
magnets in a clear resin disc. <grin>
High/North, Low/North, none, Low/South, High/South.
Then, with 5:1 gearing on the resolver, that I know fits within the
confines of my space, the combination of segment sensor/resolver shold
tell me what I need to know.
So, there's another question for somebody: How can I detect not only
the presence of a magnetic field, but its polarity? Off the top of my
head, I don't know if that's something most Hall-effect sensors are
capable of doing.
Take a look at these linear Hall Effect sensors. Their output is a
voltage that varies in proportion to the magnetic field, rising for
one pole and dropping for the other:
Linear Hall-Effect Sensors
http://www.allegromicro.com/hall/linear.asp
A1301 and A1302 Continuous-Time Ratiometric Linear Hall Effect Sensors
http://www.allegromicro.com/sf/1301/
For examples of other types, look at:
Hall-Effect Sensors
http://www.allegromicro.com/hall/
Another approach would be to use two sensors next to each other and bias
one with a small magnet to reverse the polarity it responds to.
But, as you point out, if you use a "sensor wheel" that is making
multiple turns while the platform is making its full limit of 360
degrees, none of this _guarantees_ that your monitor didn't go to sleep
and so miss a whole rotation of the sensor wheel.
So: is there any way of putting limit switches (or some sort of sensor)
on the platform?
Frank McKenney, McKenney Associates
Richmond, Virginia / (804) 320-4887
Munged E-mail: frank uscore mckenney ayut minds pring dawt cahm (y'all)
--
You can't tell which way the train went by looking at its tracks.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Paul E. Bennett
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- References:
- Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Rene Tschaggelar
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Paul E. Bennett
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Paul E. Bennett
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: Frnak McKenney
- Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- From: John Mianowski
- Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- Prev by Date: Re: ADC card selection for C6713
- Next by Date: suitable mcu
- Previous by thread: Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- Next by thread: Re: Source Sealed Potentiometers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|