Re: PIC vs AVR vs ARM

rickman wrote:

.... snip ...

And the R/C oscillator is only useful in a small percentage of
applications where you don't need any more timing precision than
what is required to run a UART, and just barely that!

A UART needs much better precision (and stability) than you can
expect from any r/c oscillator.

--
Some informative links:
<news:news.announce.newusers
<http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/>
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PIC vs AVR vs ARM
    ... applications where you don't need any more timing precision than ... A UART needs much better precision than you can ... expect from any r/c oscillator. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: PIC vs AVR vs ARM
    ... applications where you don't need any more timing precision than ... expect from any r/c oscillator. ... The LIN protocol for automotive application was designed ... requires a stable CPU clock, you just did not do your homework. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)