Re: Private baby GPS
- From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:32:35 +0100
Ico wrote:
A basic (and maybe naive) setup could be to combine RF and audio: your
device-to-track transmits an audio and RF burst at the same time, a few
times per second. These signals are picked up by 3 microphones and a
radio receiver in the field. Calculating the time between the incoming
RF and audio signals should give you enough information for making a 2D
fix of the position.
That would be rather wasteful. It's certainly easier to install a 4th audio receiver to resolve time on top of distance than to bother with a RF transmitter/receiver system on top of the ultrasonic gear. If this is going to be a wannabe GPS, it should mimic the original as close as possible, i.e. use only one signal channel.
A more useful variation of the original principle might be to invert it: have the tracked device send 'pings' at arbitrary times, and collect arrival times from 4 sensors spanning a 3D space. Then break out the maths textbook to find out how to turn that into a positional fix.
.
- References:
- Private baby GPS
- From: Giorgis
- Re: Private baby GPS
- From: Didi
- Re: Private baby GPS
- From: Giorgis
- Re: Private baby GPS
- From: Ico
- Private baby GPS
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- Next by Date: Re: Private baby GPS
- Previous by thread: Re: Private baby GPS
- Next by thread: Re: Private baby GPS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|