Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:39:55 -0500
Richard wrote:
Sebastian Schildt wrote:
=> ImageCraft
This worked pretty good, but as far as I could see there's no
debugger included, which is a minus. Worse, the website, well, is
very unprofessional and looks and reads as if it was created by a
bunch of immature teenagers. I think I'll stay away from this. (I
looked at http://www.imagecraft.com/. First I thought it is a fake
or something but I couldn't find another page)
Wow. That hurts a little. No one quite said that in the 12+ years
we have been in business. We tend to look at it as friendly
neighbor mom and pop compiler company. We offer features that we
deem are good and provide excellent support. We even offer things
that are "hard to do," like the first whole program code
compression commercial embedded C compiler and now global
optimizations. We have 10,000+ of satisified customers across
multiple CPU families. We are one of the few remaining compiler
companies in US, so I guess we are doing OK.
I don't agree with that criticism. However your pages suffer from
the too common and highly annoying failure to adapt to the width of
the users display, and thus require horizontal scrolling.
BTW, on first glance, your 'firststeps' book looks very good.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
.
- References:
- Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- From: Richard
- Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- Prev by Date: Re: EAGLE and ORCAD
- Next by Date: Re: Good book wanted
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on Rowley CrossWorks for ARM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|