Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:11:44 GMT
Donald wrote:
People may use C++ techniques but the most CPUs sold are 8-bit based, with limited ROM and RAM.
So C++ will not work on most 8-bitCPU based systems. But C++ techniques could be used in the design of such systems.
Nonsense.
The only reason for not using C++ for 8 bitters is that C++ compilers are not always available. However this is changing.
The claims about terrible inefficiency of C++ are the exaggerations. Also, the cases where the size/speed does matter are rear. If it really does matter, then most likely it signifies design level problems.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: David Brown
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: karel
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Steve at fivetrees
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Next by Date: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Previous by thread: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Next by thread: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Index(es):