Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: "Steve at fivetrees" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:28:15 -0000
"Peter Dickerson" <firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gQF9h.25114$yz3.3430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Vladimir Vassilevsky" <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NdF9h.24982$yl4.13528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To me, the whole point of using C++ is avoiding the unnecessary technical
knowledge about minor details. It is sad to see how much time is spent
learning the features of the CPU/compiler/board/OS and fighting the
stupid bugs instead of the actual development of the application.
Perhaps. It is never a good idea to think that you an get away with an
inferior programmer by providing a 'better' programming language.
Oh, good shot, sir ;).
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
.
- References:
- which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: ***
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Donald
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: David Brown
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- From: Peter Dickerson
- which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Prev by Date: SPAM: http://cheapcomputer.spamspot.com
- Next by Date: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Previous by thread: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Next by thread: Re: which object orient language is most suitable for embedded programming?
- Index(es):