Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isr has no arguments

From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:41:35 GMT

Wilco Dijkstra wrote:

Well I can see some good uses for interrupts with arguments,
making interrupt routines even easier to write in C.

In ADI VDSP, the interrupt handlers do have arguments.

I'm sure
someone has patented the idea already as it is quite obvious...

An interrupt handler is somewhat similar to a thread. If threads can have arguments, the interrupt handlers can have it too.

Vladimir Vassilevsky

DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant

http://www.abvolt.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isrhas no arguments
  - From: Jim Granville

References:
- Differences between interrupt service routine (ISR) and a subroutine
  - From: 2005
- Re: Differences between interrupt service routine (ISR) and a subroutine
  - From: Tom Lucas
- NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isr has no arguments
  - From: 2005
- Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isr has no arguments
  - From: James Beck
- Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isr has no arguments
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

Prev by Date: Re: Differences between interrupt service routine (ISR) and a subroutine
Next by Date: Re: LCD with TI DSP
Previous by thread: Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isr has no arguments
Next by thread: Re: NewQ: Difference between an isr and a subroutine is that an isrhas no arguments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread