Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: "Steve at fivetrees" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:22:49 -0000
"Christian Walter" <wolti@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:newscache$pym6aj$sii$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But as most people suggested a Message-Passing solutions I think I will go
away from the SHM approach and use a message passing system with three
tasks where one tasks acts as a coordinator.
Just read that again. If you synchronise your tasks, you won't need a
coordinator. And messaging becomes simpler.
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Boudewijn Dijkstra
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- References:
- Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Christian Walter
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Boudewijn Dijkstra
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Christian Walter
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: ChrisQuayle
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Steve at fivetrees
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Christian Walter
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Steve at fivetrees
- Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- From: Christian Walter
- Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- Prev by Date: Re: soft reset doesn't work
- Next by Date: Re: Need advices about possible ICE protocol
- Previous by thread: Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- Next by thread: Re: Shared Memory for Application/Communication decoupling
- Index(es):