Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: cbarn24050@xxxxxxx
- Date: 21 Dec 2006 11:30:40 -0800
Everett M. Greene wrote:
"karthikbg" <karthik.balaguru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Thx for all of your replies that gave me clarifications.
Got some good info from the net regarding this - i have placed it
below ....
Generally, Processor families have two distinct address spaces
through which they can communicate with these memories and peripherals.
I would take exception with the use of "generally".
I/O-mapping seems to have been initiated by Intel
way back when and only the look-alikes (Zilog, et
al) ever followed that lead.
True, the texas 9900 series and transputers had their I/O on serial
links, not mapped anywhere.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: Jim Stewart
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- References:
- Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: karthikbg
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: Pete Fenelon
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: Himanshu Chauhan
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: karthikbg
- Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- From: Everett M. Greene
- Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- Prev by Date: Re: RTL8019AS clock question
- Next by Date: Re: RTL8019AS clock question
- Previous by thread: Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- Next by thread: Re: Memory Mapped Vs I/O Mapped Vs others
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|