Re: But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- From: "werty" <werty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2006 18:14:09 -0800
No low cost MCU has a better boot loader !
________________________________________
Better than what?
Dan Henry_______________________________________
There is no more interest in Linux
and its bloat U-Boot .
Because the h/w is so much easier to work
with Linux and M$ CE are being obsoleted .
In the next 9 months , we will get a simple
free OpSys for ARM , that obsoletes all system
and application s/w .
Now you will err , and say it would take many years
because C/C++ the standard ....
It is because of C/C++ , we created Bloat , and tooks
years to write !!
Linux is bloat , written in C , cause Linus can hide his work .
In a structured , integrated language/OpSys , you cant
hide anything .
The kernel even helps you disassemble the "applications"
integrated into the kernel . And it wont force you to go
to low level code to understand how it works , like
C or Linux does ..
No human will say the word Linux nor Microsoft nor
assembler , nor GNU , nor I.D.E.
.....after the software revolt in 2007 .....
You will do everything from the 20 softkeys near the LCD .
You wont have a "day job " after the revolt ...
Modern h/d does not need many layers of
booting .
.
- References:
- But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- From: werty
- Re: But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- From: Dan Henry
- But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Best New Laser Printer to Buy
- Previous by thread: Re: But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- Next by thread: Re: But ARM9 has a bootloader , why do it need mo !!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
