Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: "larwe" <zwsdotcom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2006 17:06:44 -0800
ElderUberGeek wrote:
A country where 433 and 2.4 are ISM...
:-)
Doesn't help at all.
You cannot - repeat - CANNOT achieve a solution that is completely
applicable worldwide, particularly if encryption is required. If you're
going to get any more useful answers you need to be more forthcoming
with application details.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- References:
- Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: larwe
- Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- From: ElderUberGeek
- Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Prev by Date: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Next by Date: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Previous by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Next by thread: Re: Choice of frequency and protocol on RF links?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|